Post by xyz3000 on Feb 12, 2024 7:20:22 GMT
An agribusiness company in Botelhos (MG), whose owner is Roberto Irineu Marinho, will receive compensation for material damages of R$1.9 million. The person who must pay the amount is Rio businessman Osvaldo Aranha Neto who, as the company's attorney, allegedly diverted financial resources for his own benefit. The decision is from the 9th Civil Chamber of the Court of Justice of Minas Gerais. The rural property, which was acquired in August 1994 by Marinho, had coffee production, pig farming, milk production and marketing of all these products as its main activities. Two years later, under the guidance of Aranha Neto, who has always been linked to the coffee export area, he also began to operate in this segment.
The businessman was appointed attorney-in-fact to act as general administrator because he was an old friend of the communications businessman. According to the process, Aranha Neto had full authorization to sell assets, contract debts and obligations and Estonia Email List sub-establish. According to the records, he diverted a large sum of money for his own benefit. In addition, he made several advances and loans, both in his own name and in those of companies or farms linked to him. Upon becoming aware of the deviations, the company filed an action for compensation for an unlawful act against Aranha Neto, requesting compensation for property losses, in addition to moral damages.
Roberto Irineu Marinho claimed that he had to close the coffee business because his name was compromised. In his defense, Aranha Neto stated that he was a “de facto” partner in the business and that he acted with complete transparency, since the financial transactions were informed to Marinho and duly recorded. But, when analyzing the 29-volume process, judges Osmando Almeida (rapporteur), Pedro Bernardes and Tarcísio Martins da Costa understood that Aranha Neto was an agent and not a partner. And the expert presented documents that prove the Rio businessman's private expenses paid by the farm/company. Furthermore, there are no spreadsheets that detail such expenses.
The businessman was appointed attorney-in-fact to act as general administrator because he was an old friend of the communications businessman. According to the process, Aranha Neto had full authorization to sell assets, contract debts and obligations and Estonia Email List sub-establish. According to the records, he diverted a large sum of money for his own benefit. In addition, he made several advances and loans, both in his own name and in those of companies or farms linked to him. Upon becoming aware of the deviations, the company filed an action for compensation for an unlawful act against Aranha Neto, requesting compensation for property losses, in addition to moral damages.
Roberto Irineu Marinho claimed that he had to close the coffee business because his name was compromised. In his defense, Aranha Neto stated that he was a “de facto” partner in the business and that he acted with complete transparency, since the financial transactions were informed to Marinho and duly recorded. But, when analyzing the 29-volume process, judges Osmando Almeida (rapporteur), Pedro Bernardes and Tarcísio Martins da Costa understood that Aranha Neto was an agent and not a partner. And the expert presented documents that prove the Rio businessman's private expenses paid by the farm/company. Furthermore, there are no spreadsheets that detail such expenses.
